consumated ... maybe consummated
Maybe consummated, used or even secondhand. Its not nice to be called used, its worse still to be called second hand. But consummated, that is something else - there is romance attached to it. From the past, records, essays, writeups, by me, by others, already publically published. Maybe from past blogs. Maybe someone reading this may say, "I have read that before", so be it - Lias.

Retired. Lives in in the Far East, in Malaysia to be precise. Vision & Mission in life left too far behind; but who can crystallise the future?; now take the seconds, minutes, hours and days as they come by.
today
December 2007
November 2007
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
September 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
| Ramadhaan | |
| |
|
|
Answers By: Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Ibnul-Uthaymeen and the Committee of Major Scholars Al-Istiqaamah "Do not fast until you see the new moon, and do not stop fasting until you see it, and if it is concealed by clouds them count out (the thirty days of Sha’baan ) for it. "[1] "We are an illiterate nation that neither writes nor calculates (i.e. using astronomical calculations). The month is either like this, or this. Meaning: Sometimes it is of twenty nine days, and sometimes it is of thirty." [2] And it is established in the Saheeh (no.1909) of al-Bukhaaree from Aboo Hurayrah ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ) that the Prophet ( sallallaahu ’alayhi was sallam ) said: "Fast when it (the moon) is seen, and cease fasting when it is seen, so if is concealed by clouds then complete thirty days of Sha’baan . " And he ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) also said: There are plenty of ahaadeeth in this connection, and all of them point towards the obligation of actually sighting the moon, or if unable, then to complete the number of days in the absence of observing it. These narrations also point towards the impermisibility of using astronomical calculations in this regard. And Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah has actually stated an ijmaa’ (consensus) from the People of Knowledge about the impermisibility of relying upon astronomical calculations in this regard – and this is the truth about which there is no doubt. [4] And with Allaah alone is the ability." [5] [Q]: Is it permissible to use a Miswaak to brush one's teeth, whilst fasting. And is it permissible to use toothpaste as well? What if some blood appears whilst I brush my teeth, does this invalidate my fast? [A]: "There is no problem in cleaning one's teeth using either water, Miswaak or toothbrush, whilst fasting. Some have held it to be Makrooh (detested) to use a Miswaak whilst fasting, since it changes the smell of a person's breath. However, what is correct is that it is recommended to use a Miswaak in the beginning and the end of the day, since doing so does not change the odour, rather it just cleanses the mouth from impurities and small pieces of food that become lodged in one's teeth. As regards to the use of toothpaste, then using it is makrooh (detested), since it contains a distinctive taste and flavour which may then get mixed with one's saliva and then be swallowed. Thus, whosoever needs to use it should do so after taking the suhoor (the pre-dawn meal), before the time of Fair and fasting begins. However, if one can safeguard allowing the toothpaste and saliva to be mixed then swallowed, then there is no harm in using such toothpaste. If, whilst cleaning one's teeth with water, miswaak or a toothbrush - a small amount of blood flows out, then this does not break the fast, and Allaah knows best." [6] [Q]: Some people insist that there is an ijmaa’ (consensus) from the four well known Imaams - Aboo Haneefah, Maalik, ash Shaafi’ee and Ahmad Ibn Hanbal ( rahimahumullaah ), on praying only twenty rak’ahs for taraaweeh . Is this correct? [A]: "This is an erroneous claim. This is what has been stated in the Hanafee books of fiqh (jurisprudence), for we do not find any book that can be authentically ascribed to Aboo Haneefah (d.150H) ( rahimahullaah ) . Rather, what is apparent from looking into al-Muwatta of Imaam Muhammad (one of the main students of the Aboo Haneefah) is that Aboo Haneefah’s madhhab (school of thought) was to pray eleven rak’ahs. Imaam Muhammad includes a chapter in al Muwatta (p.110), stating: "Chapter: Establishing the Night Prayer in the month of Ramadhaan , and the virtues contained in it." Under this chapter he relates four ahaadeeth . The first, third and fourth narrations do not make mention of any specified number of rak’ahs for the Taraaweeh Prayer, rather they just mention the excellence of establishing Prayer in congregation and the excellence of the night Prayer in Ramadhaan . However, in the second narration eleven rak’ahs is mentioned. Then Imaam Muhammad said (p.111): "And we take all of this." ... Thus, he has shown that his madhhab is eleven rak’ahs, and this can only be the madhhab of Imaam Aboo Haneefah ( rahmatullaahi ’alayhi ) as well. "There is no limit to its maximum number, since it is an optional Prayer. Thus, if the standing is lengthened, whilst the number of prostrations shortened (i.e. the number of rak’ahs are fewer), then that is good and that is what is most beloved to me. However, if the number of prostrations and bowings are increased (i.e. the number of rak’ahs are increased), then this is also good. "[7] So it is affirmed that Imaam ash Shaafi’ee ( rahimahullaah ) does not advocate restricting the number of rak’ahs to twenty. Rather, he gives preference for there to be fewer rak’ahs and an increase in the length of standing. Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) has approved of eleven rak’ahs as well as twenty - as Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah says in al-Ikhtiyaaraatul-’Ilimiyyah (p.38) and Shaah Waliyyullaah says in al-Misriyyah (1/174) and al-Musaffaa (1/177). Imaam Maalik (d.179H) ( rahimahullaah ) also supports eleven rak’ahs, as Shaykhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned in al Ikhtiyaraat (p.38) and as Jalaalud-Deen as-Suyootee mentions in al-Haawee lil Fataawaa (p.350), where he said: al-Jooree, one of our companions said, from Maalik who said: '"That which ’Umar Ibnul-Khattaab gathered the people upon is more beloved to us, and that was eleven rak’ahs, and that was the prayer of Allaah’s Messenger ( salllallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam )." It was said to him: Eleven rak’abs with the Witr So he said: Yes, and thirteen is close." Then he said: "I do not know from where they have introduced these numerous rukoo’s (bowings)."[8] [1] What al-Bukhaaree relates in his Saheeh (no.2013) from Aboo Salamah Ibn ’Abdur-Rahmaan who relates that he asked ’Aa‘ishah ( radiyallaabu ’anhaa ): How was the Prayer of the Prophet ( sallallaabu ’alayhi wa sallam ) in Ramadhaan ? So she said: "Allaah’s Messenger ( sallallaabu ’alayhi wa sallam ) did not used to pray more than eleven rak’ahs during Ramadhaan or in other than Ramadhaan . He would pray four rak’ahs, and do not ask about their beauty and length. Then he would pray another four, and do not ask about their beauty and length. Then he would pray three ( witr )." [2] Jaabir ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ) said: "Allaah's Messenger ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) led us in the month of Ramadhaan with eight rak’ahs and witr . Then on the following night we gathered in the mosque and hoped that he would come out, and we continued in that state until morning. Then we entered our houses, so we said: O Messenger of Allaah, we gathered in the mosque last night hoping that you would pray with us. So he said: "I feared that it would become prescribed (i.e. obligatory) for you."[9] [3] Imaam Maalik relates in his al-Muwatta (no. 248): From Muhammad Ibn Yoosuf, from as-Saa‘ib Ibn Yazeed who said: "'Umar Ibnul-Khattaab ordered ’Ubayy Ibn Ka’b and Tameem ad-Daaree to lead the people in Prayer with eleven rak’abs. And the reciter would recite some hundreds of Verses until one of us would lean upon a stick because of the length of standing, and we had not used to finish until the appearance of Fajr ."[10] [4] ’Ubayy Ibn Ka’b came to Allaah's Messenger ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) and said: O Messenger of Allaah, something happened with me last night - meaning in Ramadhaan . So he said: And what was that ’Ubayy? He said: "Some women in my house said, we do not recite the Qur’aan , so can you lead us in Prayer? So I lead them in eight rak’ahs and prayed the witr. " And this was a Sunnah of his approval, since he remained quiet and he did not say anything.[11] So all this goes to show that insisting that there is a consensus on praying only twenty rak’ahs for taraaweeh - claiming this to be the only view of all the four well-known Imaams - is not only incorrect, but is against the established evidence. As regards a detailed discussion regarding the whole issue, then this is not possible here, nor is it the place to discuss the correctness, or merits, of praying twenty rak’ahs over eight, or vice-versa. Rather, one can find such discussions in the relevant chapters in the books of fiqh, whilst remembering that: "Difference in opinion must not be a source of obstinancy nor anger."[12] [A]: "The fasting person must increase in obedience to Allaah, and to keep away from all the prohibited maters. It is obligatory upon the fasting person to safeguard the obligatory duties and to distance himself from all the prohibitions. So he should pray the five daily Prayers in their correct times and in congregation, and abandon lying, backbiting, cheating, dealing in usury, and all other prohibited matters. The Prophet ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) said: "Whosoever does not abandon falsehood in speech and action, then Allaah The Almighty and Majestic has no need that he should leave his food and drink. "[13] [14] [A]: "Whosoever uses eye or ear drops for medicinal purposes, then this does not invalidate their fast, and this is the correct opinion. This is because such drops are not termed as being food or drink - neither are they called so by convention, nor by Islaamic terminology - and this is because such drops are administered through those places which food and drink are not administered. However, if taking such drops could be delayed until the night, then this would avoid entering into any difference of opinion. Similarly, whosoever vomits whilst fasting, then this does not invalidate their fast. This is because Allaah does not burden a soul with more than it can bear, and also that the Sharee’ah (Divinely Prescribed Islaamic law) is built upon facilitating ease and removing hardships, as Allaah - the Most High - said: "Whosoever has an attack of vomiting then no atonement is required of hint, but whoever intentionally vomits, then let him atone for it. "[15] [16] |
From The Australian
Macabre legacy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Australian heroin mule Nguyen Tuong Van will be hanged in Singapore
using a method devised in 19th-century Britain, writes Nick Cater
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 26, 2005
THE hangman's craft calls for a good stout rope with enough tensile
strength to withstand a force of about 570kg, which is sufficient to
snap the neck of a condemned prisoner, putting them in a coma for the
six minutes or so it takes the brain to shut down.
If the pressure on the side of the neck from the noose is less than
570kg when the body's fall is arrested, the prisoner will probably
suffer prolonged death by strangulation.
Should the hangman miscalculate the length of the rope, allowing the
body to fall too far, the force will be too great and, unless the rope
snaps, death will be by decapitation.
Hanging grew in popularity from the 5th century onwards in Europe as a
means of execution, partly because it provided a spectacle. The body
of a murderer, witch or thief was strung high above the crowd, giving
everyone a perfect view.
But judicial hanging is never tidy, even when professionally executed,
and these days in pristine Singapore executions are carried out
quietly, with a minimum of publicity, behind the walls of the rebuilt
Changi Prison.
The Singapore Government stopped announcing executions five years ago
and refuses to give out any information about life on death row.
Although it is happy to publicise the death penalty in abstraction,
believing its existence to be a deterrent to drug traffickers, the
details of the execution, using a method devised in 19th-century
Britain, are never officially discussed.
Nevertheless it is possible to piece together a detailed picture of
how convicted Australian heroin trafficker Nguyen Tuong Van's life
will end, using accounts obtained from relatives of prisoners by
Amnesty International and from a rare interview I conducted in 1996
with the Malaysian hangman who executed Kevin Barlow and Brian
Chambers, also for heroin trafficking.
Before their post-colonial separation in 1965, Singapore and Malaysia
had a joint prisons department and, despite their technological
advances in many other areas, the Singaporeans have been unable to
improve on the long-drop execution technique introduced to British
prisons in 1872. The mechanics and rituals of this macabre colonial
legacy have barely altered since the mother country hanged its last
prisoner 41 years ago.
A week or so before the twin trap doors open beneath her son's feet,
Kim Nguyen can expect to receive a terse letter from the
superintendent of Changi Prison. "You are advised to make the
necessary funeral arrangements," the letter will say. "If you are
unable to do so, cremation will be carried out by the state."
Nguyen Tuong Van was about to fly to Melbourne when he was caught in
transit at Changi airport in December 2002 with almost 400g of heroin
strapped to his body and in his hand luggage. He said he had been
pressured by loan sharks to act as a drug mule to help pay off his
twin brother Khoa's legal debts of $25,000. The sales executive from
Glen Waverley, a middle-class suburb east of Melbourne, has no
previous criminal record. He was sentenced to death in March last
year. After Singapore's President S.R. Nathan refused his clemency
petition last Friday, Nguyen is set to become the first Australian to
be executed in 12 years, since Sydney barman Michael McAuliffe was
hanged in Malaysia in 1993 for heroin trafficking.
Nguyen, 25, will spend the final days of his short life in an
isolation cell approximately 3mx3m, furnished with a toilet and a bed
mat but no bedding.
In Nguyen's final few days, the regulation restricting family visiting
time to 20 minutes a week will be relaxed, although physical contact
will be strictly forbidden.
Nguyen is also allowed a television in his cell to receive the
sanitised entertainment provided by Singapore's Channel Five
English-language service.
Finally, on the night before his execution, he will be allowed to eat
a takeaway meal of his choice, within the prison's budget.
Earlier that day Nguyen will meet his executioner, who will weigh him
and examine his physique. After subtracting 6.3kg from the body
weight, the notional weight of the head, the executioner will consult
the Official Table of Drops, last revised in 1913, to calculate the
length of the rope.
British Home Office regulations, adopted by Singapore, stipulate that
the drop will be between 1.83m and 2.44m. For a condemned man weighing
66kg, for example, the rope should be 2.03m, with an additional 33cm
added for the circumference of the neck.
Before Britain abolished the death penalty in 1964, the rope was
specially made at a factory in Wellington, Somerset, woven from
Italian silk hemp, chosen because it did not stretch. Elasticity in a
rope reduces the deceleration force on the victim's neck, making death
more painful. Today the favoured rope is made of Terylene, the least
elastic of all the synthetic fibres used in rope making.
Friday is execution day at Changi, and before the sun rises, the
hangman and his assistant will test the lever operating the twin trap
doors and recheck the measurement of the rope.
Once the prisoner is collected from his cell shortly before 6am, speed
is of the essence. The longer it takes, the greater the opportunity
for panic and struggle.
A hood is placed over the prisoner's head and his hands are pinioned
behind his back, usually with handcuffs. His legs are bound together
with wire to prevent him kicking out and catching them against the
sides of the trapdoor. The rope, attached to a concealed beam, is
positioned around the neck and the trapdoor lever on the execution
platform is pulled. The clunk of the wooden doors echoes around the
chamber. Before the prison was modernised, the sound could be clearly
heard by other prisoners on death row. If everything goes to plan, the
strike force of the noose will dislocate the neck at the second and
third cervical vertebrae, the classic hangman's fracture. The prisoner
will enter complete neurogenic shock, unable to process pain, although
electrical activity may continue in the brain for several minutes
after the spinal cord is cut.
The body is left for 30 minutes. A doctor will perform an autopsy and
issue a death certificate. By mid-morning the cadaver is ready for
collection by relatives.
When prime minister Goh Chok Tong was asked in a BBC interview two
years ago if he knew the precise number of people executed in 2003, he
replied dismissively: "I've got more important issues to worry about."
Amnesty International claims more than 400 prisoners were hanged in
Singapore from 1991 to 2003, the highest per capita rate of executions
in the world by a considerable margin. More than half of those
executed were drug traffickers.
In Singapore the issue is rarely debated, the country's low crime rate
being seen as sufficient justification for capital punishment.
Abolition, it is said, would send the wrong message to criminals who
may interpret it as an indication that the Government is going soft on
crime.
Albert Pierrepoint, Britain's hangman for 25 years, saw things
somewhat differently in his 1974 autobiography. "All the men and women
whom I have faced at that final moment convince me that in what I have
done, I have not prevented a single murder," he confessed. "I do not
now believe that any one of the hundreds of executions I carried out
has in any way acted as a deterrent against future murder. Capital
punishment, in my view, achieved nothing except revenge."
Nick Cater is The Australian's assistant editor (news) and a former
News Limited Asia correspondent.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au

From The New Straits Times
16 October 2005
THE SUNDAY COLUMN: Decency begets decency
Kalimullah Hassan
WONDER how Nadim Bokhari felt when Sarawak’s Kota Sentosa Hospital
director Dr Abdul Kadir Abu Bakar called him "an animal".
Wonder how singer Hattan felt when Members of Parliament attacked him
for allegedly ridiculing the national anthem.
They also wanted those who ridiculed the flag or the national anthem
to be, among other things, thrown into the sea, stripped of their
citizenship and not allowed to stay in Malaysia.
Wonder how journalist Shahriman Johari felt when another Member of
Parliament attacked him and questioned his ethnicity.
What did they do that was so wrong?
Nadim, the New Straits Times photographer in Kuching, was carrying out
the duties given him by his editors — taking photographs of a man who
had been confined to a psychiatric hospital for 12 years for molesting
a 19-year-old girl.
Dr Abdul Kadir did not like the man being photographed, so he shouted
at Nadim:
"Hoi, you come here. You are not a human being. You are an animal. If
the picture comes out tomorrow, I will sue you."
The picture did come out, Dr Abdul Kadir, on Page 28 of the New
Straits Times on Friday, Oct 14, 2005. So, sue us.
We, too, would like to see you go to open court and see if you use the
same tone and language on the judge.
We too would like to see whether you, a man with a hard-earned medical
degree and a director of a hospital, would deem it fit to speak down
to other individuals like Nadim, who may not be qualified like you,
but is just earning an honest living to feed his family.
Having less money or being in a lesser position does not make Nadim
less human, Dr Abdul Kadir. It does not make him an animal.
And "hoi"?
It is Ramadan. Even on normal days, calling someone "hoi" in our
society is both rude and demeaning.
Maybe they do not teach that in medical school. But decency dictates
that we do not call people "hoi".
http://www.mmail.com.my/Current_News/MM/Saturday/Frontpage
/20051015111703/Article/index_html
MAIL HIGHLIGHTS: RM39,000 bazaar lot
Marhalim Abas & Fadhal Ilahi Abdul Ghani
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 15:
THAT'S how much some traders have paid for choice lots in Kuala LumpurCity
Hall's Ramadan bazaars.
A trader in Masjid India claims the lots, licensed by City Hall for as low
as RM250 each, had been resold for a staggering profit!
The arrest of the IGP's son has opened up claims that City Hall has been in
the practice of awarding Ramadan trading lots to people linked to certain
politicians and VIPs.
A spokesman for the traders at Jalan Masjid India told The Malay Mail that
for the past three years, City Hall had also awarded lots to organisations
with links to political parties.
Trader Rizal Hassan said this practice has been prevalent for several years.
He described the businessmen as "profiteers".
He said these "profiteers" would then canvass for buyers who are small-time
traders.
From The New Straits Times
9 October 2005
THE SUNDAY COLUMN: It’s the balik kampung time of the year
Kalimullah Hassan
THAT stretch when one celebration follows another and takes us on
nostalgic roller-coaster rides is here again.
For one month, the Muslims will fast; and for those same 30 days,
their non-Muslim friends will break fast with them.
It’s fun to watch a table of Muslims and non-Muslims, with abundant
cuisine before them, glancing at their watches frequently, waiting for
the time to break fast.
And the moment the azan (call to prayer) or gong sounds, they go for
the food together, as if all had gone hungry the whole day.
But that’s what makes it great fun, the "togetherness" they accord
each other.
Just a couple of days before the Eid, or Hari Raya Puasa, we will
celebrate Deepavali.
Once Hari Raya comes, there will be days of shared gatherings. I think
they are calling it DeepaRaya (just like KongsiRaya when the Eid and
Chinese New Year fall days apart).
|
Ramadhaan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions on RamadhaanAnswers By: Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Ibnul-Uthaymeen and the Committee of Major Scholars DETERMINING THE BEGINNING OF RAMADAAN
[Q]: Is it permissible to rely upon astronomical calculations in determining the start of Ramadhaan ? [A]: "The Prophet ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) ordered the Muslims saying: "Do not fast until you see the new moon, and do not stop fasting until you see it, and if it is concealed by clouds them count out (the thirty days of Sha’baan ) for it. "[1] And he ( ’alayhis-salaatu was-salaam ) said:
"We are an illiterate nation that neither writes nor calculates (i.e. using astronomical calculations). The month is either like this, or this. Meaning: Sometimes it is of twenty nine days, and sometimes it is of thirty." [2] And it is established in the Saheeh (no.1909) of al-Bukhaaree from Aboo Hurayrah ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ) that the Prophet ( sallallaahu ’alayhi was sallam ) said: "Fast when it (the moon) is seen, and cease fasting when it is seen, so if is concealed by clouds then complete thirty days of Sha’baan . " And he ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) also said: "Do not fast until you have seen the moon, and if it is concealed by clouds then complete thirty days. " [3] There are plenty of ahaadeeth in this connection, and all of them point towards the obligation of actually sighting the moon, or if unable, then to complete the number of days in the absence of observing it. These narrations also point towards the impermisibility of using astronomical calculations in this regard. And Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah has actually stated an ijmaa’ (consensus) from the People of Knowledge about the impermisibility of relying upon astronomical calculations in this regard – and this is the truth about which there is no doubt. [4] And with Allaah alone is the ability." [5] BRUSHING ONE'S TEETH WHILST FASTING
[Q]: Is it permissible to use a Miswaak to brush one's teeth, whilst fasting. And is it permissible to use toothpaste as well? What if some blood appears whilst I brush my teeth, does this invalidate my fast? [A]: "There is no problem in cleaning one's teeth using either water, Miswaak or toothbrush, whilst fasting. Some have held it to be Makrooh (detested) to use a Miswaak whilst fasting, since it changes the smell of a person's breath. However, what is correct is that it is recommended to use a Miswaak in the beginning and the end of the day, since doing so does not change the odour, rather it just cleanses the mouth from impurities and small pieces of food that become lodged in one's teeth. As regards to the use of toothpaste, then using it is makrooh (detested), since it contains a distinctive taste and flavour which may then get mixed with one's saliva and then be swallowed. Thus, whosoever needs to use it should do so after taking the suhoor (the pre-dawn meal), before the time of Fair and fasting begins. However, if one can safeguard allowing the toothpaste and saliva to be mixed then swallowed, then there is no harm in using such toothpaste. If, whilst cleaning one's teeth with water, miswaak or a toothbrush - a small amount of blood flows out, then this does not break the fast, and Allaah knows best." [6] CONCERNING THE TARAAWEEH PRAYER
[Q]: Some people insist that there is an ijmaa’ (consensus) from the four well known Imaams - Aboo Haneefah, Maalik, ash Shaafi’ee and Ahmad Ibn Hanbal ( rahimahumullaah ), on praying only twenty rak’ahs for taraaweeh . Is this correct? [A]: "This is an erroneous claim. This is what has been stated in the Hanafee books of fiqh (jurisprudence), for we do not find any book that can be authentically ascribed to Aboo Haneefah (d.150H) ( rahimahullaah ) . Rather, what is apparent from looking into al-Muwatta of Imaam Muhammad (one of the main students of the Aboo Haneefah) is that Aboo Haneefah’s madhhab (school of thought) was to pray eleven rak’ahs. Imaam Muhammad includes a chapter in al Muwatta (p.110), stating: "Chapter: Establishing the Night Prayer in the month of Ramadhaan , and the virtues contained in it." Under this chapter he relates four ahaadeeth . The first, third and fourth narrations do not make mention of any specified number of rak’ahs for the Taraaweeh Prayer, rather they just mention the excellence of establishing Prayer in congregation and the excellence of the night Prayer in Ramadhaan . However, in the second narration eleven rak’ahs is mentioned. Then Imaam Muhammad said (p.111): "And we take all of this." ... Thus, he has shown that his madhhab is eleven rak’ahs, and this can only be the madhhab of Imaam Aboo Haneefah ( rahmatullaahi ’alayhi ) as well. Ash-Shaafi'ee (d.204H) ( rahimahullaah ) said:
"There is no limit to its maximum number, since it is an optional Prayer. Thus, if the standing is lengthened, whilst the number of prostrations shortened (i.e. the number of rak’ahs are fewer), then that is good and that is what is most beloved to me. However, if the number of prostrations and bowings are increased (i.e. the number of rak’ahs are increased), then this is also good. "[7] So it is affirmed that Imaam ash Shaafi’ee ( rahimahullaah ) does not advocate restricting the number of rak’ahs to twenty. Rather, he gives preference for there to be fewer rak’ahs and an increase in the length of standing. Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) has approved of eleven rak’ahs as well as twenty - as Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah says in al-Ikhtiyaaraatul-’Ilimiyyah (p.38) and Shaah Waliyyullaah says in al-Misriyyah (1/174) and al-Musaffaa (1/177). Imaam Maalik (d.179H) ( rahimahullaah ) also supports eleven rak’ahs, as Shaykhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned in al Ikhtiyaraat (p.38) and as Jalaalud-Deen as-Suyootee mentions in al-Haawee lil Fataawaa (p.350), where he said: al-Jooree, one of our companions said, from Maalik who said: '"That which ’Umar Ibnul-Khattaab gathered the people upon is more beloved to us, and that was eleven rak’ahs, and that was the prayer of Allaah’s Messenger ( salllallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam )." It was said to him: Eleven rak’abs with the Witr So he said: Yes, and thirteen is close." Then he said: "I do not know from where they have introduced these numerous rukoo’s (bowings)."[8] Praying eleven rak’ahs is based upon a number of authentic narrations, from them: [1] What al-Bukhaaree relates in his Saheeh (no.2013) from Aboo Salamah Ibn ’Abdur-Rahmaan who relates that he asked ’Aa‘ishah ( radiyallaabu ’anhaa ): How was the Prayer of the Prophet ( sallallaabu ’alayhi wa sallam ) in Ramadhaan ? So she said: "Allaah’s Messenger ( sallallaabu ’alayhi wa sallam ) did not used to pray more than eleven rak’ahs during Ramadhaan or in other than Ramadhaan . He would pray four rak’ahs, and do not ask about their beauty and length. Then he would pray another four, and do not ask about their beauty and length. Then he would pray three ( witr )." [2] Jaabir ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ) said: "Allaah's Messenger ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) led us in the month of Ramadhaan with eight rak’ahs and witr . Then on the following night we gathered in the mosque and hoped that he would come out, and we continued in that state until morning. Then we entered our houses, so we said: O Messenger of Allaah, we gathered in the mosque last night hoping that you would pray with us. So he said: "I feared that it would become prescribed (i.e. obligatory) for you."[9] [3] Imaam Maalik relates in his al-Muwatta (no. 248): From Muhammad Ibn Yoosuf, from as-Saa‘ib Ibn Yazeed who said: "'Umar Ibnul-Khattaab ordered ’Ubayy Ibn Ka’b and Tameem ad-Daaree to lead the people in Prayer with eleven rak’abs. And the reciter would recite some hundreds of Verses until one of us would lean upon a stick because of the length of standing, and we had not used to finish until the appearance of Fajr ."[10] [4] ’Ubayy Ibn Ka’b came to Allaah's Messenger ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) and said: O Messenger of Allaah, something happened with me last night - meaning in Ramadhaan . So he said: And what was that ’Ubayy? He said: "Some women in my house said, we do not recite the Qur’aan , so can you lead us in Prayer? So I lead them in eight rak’ahs and prayed the witr. " And this was a Sunnah of his approval, since he remained quiet and he did not say anything.[11] So all this goes to show that insisting that there is a consensus on praying only twenty rak’ahs for taraaweeh - claiming this to be the only view of all the four well-known Imaams - is not only incorrect, but is against the established evidence. As regards a detailed discussion regarding the whole issue, then this is not possible here, nor is it the place to discuss the correctness, or merits, of praying twenty rak’ahs over eight, or vice-versa. Rather, one can find such discussions in the relevant chapters in the books of fiqh, whilst remembering that: "Difference in opinion must not be a source of obstinancy nor anger."[12] WHAT SHOULD I DO IN RAMADAAN:
[Q]: What should a fasting person do, and what is obligatory upon him? [A]: "The fasting person must increase in obedience to Allaah, and to keep away from all the prohibited maters. It is obligatory upon the fasting person to safeguard the obligatory duties and to distance himself from all the prohibitions. So he should pray the five daily Prayers in their correct times and in congregation, and abandon lying, backbiting, cheating, dealing in usury, and all other prohibited matters. The Prophet ( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) said: "Whosoever does not abandon falsehood in speech and action, then Allaah The Almighty and Majestic has no need that he should leave his food and drink. "[13] [14] EYE DROPS AND VOMITING:
[Q]: Is it permissible to use eye or ear-drops whilst fasting, or does it invalidate the fast? And does vomiting also break the fast? [A]: "Whosoever uses eye or ear drops for medicinal purposes, then this does not invalidate their fast, and this is the correct opinion. This is because such drops are not termed as being food or drink - neither are they called so by convention, nor by Islaamic terminology - and this is because such drops are administered through those places which food and drink are not administered. However, if taking such drops could be delayed until the night, then this would avoid entering into any difference of opinion. Similarly, whosoever vomits whilst fasting, then this does not invalidate their fast. This is because Allaah does not burden a soul with more than it can bear, and also that the Sharee’ah (Divinely Prescribed Islaamic law) is built upon facilitating ease and removing hardships, as Allaah - the Most High - said: "And We have not made for you any hardships in the Religion." [Sooratul-Baqarah 2:221] Also, the Prophet( sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam ) said:
"Whosoever has an attack of vomiting then no atonement is required of hint, but whoever intentionally vomits, then let him atone for it. "[15] [16] Footnotes:
[1] Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 1906) and Muslim (no. 1080), from Ibn ’Umar ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ). [2] Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 1913), front Ibn ’Umar ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ). [3] Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 1907), from Ibn ’Umar.
[4] Refer to Fathul-Baaree (4/159) of al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr.
[5] Answered by Shaykh ’Abdul-’Azeez Ibn Baaz in Fataawas-Siyaam (p.13).
[6] Answered by Shaykh Ibn Jibreen in Fataawas Siyaam (p.40).
[7] Quoted by Ibn Nasr al-Marwazee in Qiyaamul-Layl (p.92).
[8] Tanqeedus-Sadeed bi Risaalati Ijtihaad wat-Taqleed (p.266-268) of Shaykh Badee’ud-Deen as-Sindee. [9] Related by Ibn Nasr (p.90) and others. Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr indicated in Fathul-Baaree (3/10) that the narration is strong. [10] Shaykh al-Albaanee says in Salaatut-Taraaweeh (p.4)): "And its chain of narration is Saheeh Jiddan (extremely authentic)." [11] Hasan: Related by Ibn Nasr al-Marwazee (p.90). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Salaatut-Taraaweeh (p.68). [12] From Aadaahul-Khilaaf (p.7) of Shaykh Saalih al Humaid.
[13] Related by al-Bukhaaree (4/99). from Aboo Hurayrah ( radiyallaahu ’anhu ) . [14] Answered by Shaykh Ibnul-’Uthaymeen in Haqeeqatus-Siyaam (pp.24-25).
[15] Saheeh: Related by Aboo Daawood (2/310). It was authenticated by Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah in Fataawas Siyaam (p.14). 16. Answered by the Committee of Major Scholars in Fataawas-Siyaam (p.44).
|
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Sunday/Columns/
20051002080655/Article/indexb_html
THE SUNDAY COLUMN: Rafidah... and chutzpah
Kalimullah Hassan Oct 2:
CHILDREN who grew up on Aesop's Fables, stories by the Brothers Grimm and
Hans Christian Andersen, Sheherezade's 1001 Nights and proverbs and old
wives' tales, learned lessons that have stayed with them.
From the tale of The Boy Who Cried Wolf, we learned that if we tell lies,
people will not believe us when we tell the truth; we learned from Androcles
and The Lion that gratitude is a sign of a noble soul.
And we learned from The Prince and the Bundle of Sticks that unity is
strength.
The great fairy tales depict morality through anecdotes of tussles between
good and evil.
They depict character and virtue attractively; wickedness and deception are
evil.
Through these stories, we face the unvarnished truth about ourselves and are
compelled into thinking about what kind of people we want to be.
One of the most-liked fairy tales is Beauty and the Beast because it
contrasts goodness with badness in an appealing way.
The story starts with a very rich merchant with three daughters, all of whom
are extremely beautiful, especially the youngest.
She was called "The Little Beauty" but the story does not talk about her
physical attributes.
Instead, it draws attention to her virtuous character. Her moral goodness,
or inner beauty, is contrasted with her sisters' pride, vanity and
selfishness, their inner ugliness.
By portraying the world in which ugly beasts are transformed into princes
and where evil persons are turned to stone, fairy tales remind us of the
moral truths.
These tales draw a distinct line between good and evil. But in the real
world, as we know it, there are grey areas.
There is good and there is evil, and there are good people who have a little
vice and there are evil people who may have a good streak in them.
And we also know that the mere ability to use moral principles to justify
one's actions does not make that person virtuous.
We see in our world people who shout loud about virtues and principles but
who really are trying to hide their flaws.
We all forget sometimes, as one philosopher said, that "you cannot dream
yourself into a character; you must hammer and forge yourself one", or that
"character is what you know you are, not what others think you have".
We learn from what great writers such as Somerset Maugham meant when he
said: "When you choose your friends, do not be short-changed by choosing
personality over character."
Or what John Wooden meant when he wrote, "Be more concerned with your
character than your reputation, because your character is what you really
are; your reputation is merely what others think you are".
Over the last four months, much has been said and written about
International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz and the
Approved Permits (AP) issue.
It is hard to sympathise with Rafidah's public persona.
She is brash, acts intellectually superior, and, when faced with criticism,
comes out guns blazing, never faltering a second to consider that she could
have made a mistake.
Sometimes, we must remember the proverb that we cannot break through a wall
with our forehead.
But people often judge a bird by its flight, which is really unfair to
Rafidah because she is being judged more by her reactions rather than her
deeds.
Rafidah has been in active politics since 1974 when she became a Member of
Parliament and, after almost a quarter-century as a minister, is the second
longest serving Cabinet member.